"I wonder who's kissing him now." Marine Commandant General James Amos' inconvenient jeremiads on 'Don't ask, don't

by Dr. Jeffrey Lant

The winds of change are blowing through the military establishment. It is clear that openly gay service personnel are an inevitability and that "Don't ask, don't tell" is on its way out.

These days Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a man trusted by both political parties and the service chiefs, has a message for them all: if we are to manage the end of "Don't Ask, don't tell" the way we want it... we had best act quickly before the civilian courts step in and tell us what to do. Change is inevitable, he says, but handling it our way is not.

Right now, various judges, their itchy fingers and intrusive court orders at the ready, are giving the military time to sort out their own house. But the clock is ticking... ticking.

Secretary Gates reminds all that "Don't ask, don't tell", that invidious, unconstitutional, discriminatory policy that has kept military gays locked firmly in the closet since the Clinton Administration is moving inexorably into the scrap heap of history's lousy ideas.  He aims to be on the right side as inevitability unfolds.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen knows it, too. He's on board with the new political realities as are all savvy officers who can see the way the wind blows.

But, conspicuously brand-new Marine Commandant James Amos is not. To the increasing embarrassment of the military establishment, General Amos has become a fountainhead of notoriously unpersuasive insipidities on the subject:

One by one, the panjandrums of the military have thrown in the towel and taken up the new party line, admitting that gays (imagine!) have been serving, are serving and will serve in every service with distinction... what is the big deal, after all?

General Amos, new kid on the block, Bourbon-like, has learned nothing and forgotten nothing. Bourbon-like he has now become the problem... and you know what happened to these clueless French monarchs.

If his military brethren have weakened and strayed, he most assuredly has not. Why just the other day he uncorked this sour vintage, designed to frighten Marine parents everywhere:

"I don't want to have any Marines that I'm visiting at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any kind of distraction."

This, of course, is demagoguery of the worst kind... seeking to support an outmoded policy through fear mongering. It defines the man's approach to this issue. If he cannot have victory, he can at least have the last word. (But there is that in him which feels that even now, against all odds, he can still have victory. After all he is a Marine... and that is enough.)

Should we abolish "Don't ask, don't tell," he emphasizes, your Marine son, who needs to focus on winning the engagement and staying alive, could well face and would have to respond immediately to unwanted sexual advances from deviate members of the corps who could use war to get sex. Thus, instead of moving against the enemy, your comely lad would be distracted... even unto the ultimate sacrifice.

"I wonder who's kissing him now."

In 1909 America danced to and hummed along with a catchy Gilded Age pop tune, "I wonder who's kissing her now." This lilting waltz, with changed gender, now appears to be running through General Amos' fetid mind:

"I wonder who's kissing him now, I wonder who's teaching him how? Wonder who's looking into his eyes? Breathing sighs! Telling lies! I wonder if he's got a boy? The boy who once filled me with joy, Wonder if he ever tells him of me? I wonder who's kissing him now."

Fascinated, revolted, the licentious scene is painfully clear to the general. As the enemy's attacks intensify, as the enemy moves in, as your son's full concentration is earnestly required... he has to fend off an amorous corpsman  intent on nookie instead of self-protection... and victory. Oh, my.

Imagine, they sleep together. The general cannot forget.

The Marine Corps, unlike other services, houses a pair of people in a room, collegiate style. This, they say, promotes "unity." Perhaps, as the general worries, too much so. Here's what he said in November, 2010 in a statement that alerted the politically sensitive to the problem they faced in General Amos:

"There is nothing more intimate than young men and young women ­ and when you talk of infantry we're talking of our young men ­ laying out, sleeping along side of one another and sharing death, fear and loss of brothers," General Amos said. "I don't know what the effect of that will be on cohesion. I mean, that's what we're looking at. It's unit cohesion, it's combat effectiveness."

It's buncombe.

The general says, and no doubt believes with all the power of  the last pterodactyl, that men of a certain sexual orientation will during combat do things other than everything they can to stay alive.  Does anyone else concur with this lapse of insight and intellect?

Let's be clear: men, women, gay, straight during combat they will all focus on staying alive, then on achieving the objective. Sexual orientation does not change this truth one iota.

As a result, basing his case on a rancid fallacy, this general of antiquated views and big mouth lumbers on, embarrassing the president, the military establishment, and every thinking Marine; all of them with gay friends and colleagues and absolutely no problem serving with them worldwide.

Then what of General Amos? So newly installed, he has already committed political hara kiri, still walking and too much talking, but of no earthly consequence. The Marine Corps deserves better. Fortunately, in due course, as General Amos keeps talking, they will get it. For such a man with such views has besmirched Semper Fi. And that will never do.

About the Author

Harvard-educated Dr. Jeffrey Lant is CEO of Worldprofit, Inc., www.worldprofit.com where
small and home-based businesses learn how to profit online. Attend Dr. Lant's live webcast
TODAY and receive 50,000 free guaranteed visitors to the website of your choice! For details on Dr. Lant's 18 best-selling business books, go to www.jeffreylant.com

Marine Self Defense

Marine Self Defense

Does anyone know what the chances are of getting a moral waiver in the Marines for a felony?

A felony (one), in particular, for assault w/ deadly weapon ...which in my case has mitigating factors (though not explicitly stated in my charge) alluding to self-defense? Anyone with any experience in this...any advice would be appreciated.

With the strong enlistment needs at the moment, as long as you were a juvenile when the crime was committed, you would almost certainly get the waiver. If you were an adult, it will be a little trickier and will depend on the personal judgment of the MEPS station recruiter and the station officer (usually in the capital of the state) for that particular state.

You would also have a slightly better chance of getting the waiver for the Army, since their needs are the greatest at the moment.

My advice would be this: emphasize the mitigating factors, emphasize that your record is clean other than this charge (it better be!), explain how much you want to serve your country: be genuine and be truthful. That will get you the furthest. My personal estimation of your chances, if you do those things and your record is clean otherwise:

Committed the crime as a juvenile: 90% - 95%
Committed the crime as an adult: 50% - 75% (depends on the details of the crime and how long ago it was committed)

Good luck and thank you for at least attempting to serve our country.

Nathan

Marine Self Defense
Brutal Self-Defense: Jugular Attack

Marine Self Defense

Could Not Find What You Are Looking For? Search Below

Tags: assault, ccw, crime, marine self defense, marine self defense force, marine self defense techniques, marine self defense training, marine self defense video, military, shopping